where i>=0 stands for how much interest M shows towards N, c>=0 stands for how much consideration M shows for N, and n>=0 stands for how nicely M talks to N.One can easily see that as either i, c, or n increases, the attractive force F of M converges zero. And vice versa, when all of i, c, and n converge zero, the attractive force of M grows infinite. Note that the attraction force F is independent of any specific instances of M and N.
(Note: Independent observers have noted a slight repulsive force with very large values of i and n, but this is yet to be confirmed.)
7 comments:
That's what u have been working lately... ic...
A translation was requested:
Matin yleinen vetovoimalaki
Orgaaninen kokonaisuus ("mies", merkitään M) vetää puoleensa jokaista orgaanista kokonaisuutta ("nainen", merk. N) voimalla, joka on käänteisesti verrannollinen M:n osoittamaan kiinnostukseen N:stä (merk. i), M:n huomaavaisuuteen N:ää kohtaan (merk. c), ja M:n ystävällisyyteen N:lle (merk. n):
F(M->N)=1/(i+2c+n)
Näin ollen, arvojen i, c tai n kasvaessa M:n vetovoima lähestyy nollaa, ja vastaavasti arvojen i, c ja n lähestyessä nollaa, M:n vetovoima kasvaa rajatta. Huomioimisen arvoista on se, että voima F on riippumaton olioiden M ja N nimenomaisista ilmentymistä.
Or maybe it's more like this:
F(M->N)=(i[N]+2c[N]+n[N])/(i[M]+2c[M]+n[M])
Where the characters in []s are subscripts--so i[N]is the interest the woman shows in the man and i[m] is the interest the man shows in the woman. If it's this equation (whose values would go from zero to infinity), then a harmonious state would be achieved when the force is 1. A force greater than 1 indicates greater force (attraction to the woman) on the part of the man and values smaller than 1 indicate greater force (attraction to the man) on the part of the female. Anyway, the point is that you want the coefficient to be around 1.
The equation above seems incomplete though because the numerator and denominator aren't independent; an increase in the denominator would cause an increase in the numerator in certain conditions, probably when the overall value was around 1. But an increase in the denominator might cause a decrease in the numerator when the overall value is far from 1.
You have obviously been busy lately, otherwise I cannot understand how this easy task has provided you with such complicated formula. Following justus universal notation:
F(M->N) = Ai[n]
Summarizing, the only variable here is woman's interest, and A stands for Andrés constant. I am just envious of people like Böhr, Planck and the like.
I Think itt is this:
F(M<-N) = 1/i
Where The force how much the woman desires the man is exactly the inverse of how much the man is interested in the woman.
Justus; I think that Justus' Theorem above is a nice corollary of Matti's Law on Universal Attraction.
Andrés; is Andrés' constant about the magnitude of Planck length (1.6 × 10E−35) or Avogadro's constant (6.02 × 10E+23)? Or something between?
My hypothesis is that if Justus' Theorem is mapped as a function of time F(t), it will produce a beautifully oscillating curve. That curve will, however, have the property that for any ε>0, there exists a point t0, so that when t>t0, F(t)< ε.
Post a Comment